trydock.ai

agent readiness score · scanned Aug 18, 2026 · 8s · Agent Tools

#51 of 979 · #7 in category

77/ 100B

Dock is a cloud-hosted shared workspace where humans and AI agents collaborate in real-time on structured data and rich-text documents, with agents acting as first-class identities.

badge

Discovery 16/20

Access 19.6/30

Usability 31.7/40

Payments 10/10

Top fixes

  1. JSON-LD structured data

    Embed Organization + WebSite JSON-LD on your homepage (name, url, logo, sameAs) and Product/Offer JSON-LD on pricing.

    +4.6
  2. Semantic HTML structure

    Add landmark elements and a clean heading hierarchy — missing: <main> landmark, <header>/<footer>, no heading-level skips, text-to-markup ratio ≥ 0.10.

    +3.5
  3. Markdown content negotiation

    Serve text/markdown when clients send `Accept: text/markdown` (or expose .md twins of key pages) — agents get far more signal per token.

    +3.5
  4. agents.md

    Add /agents.md: what agents may do on your site, key URLs, auth, rate limits, and who to contact.

    +2.6
  5. Brand search discoverability

    Your domain doesn't surface when agents search "Dock". Strengthen brand pages, structured data, and third-party citations (docs portals, GitHub, directories).

    +2
  6. Developer resource discoverability

    Create a crawlable /docs or developers.trydock.ai hub and link it from your homepage footer so search-grounded agents find your official API docs.

    +2

1.Can an agent discover and trust you?

10/12

Whether agents can crawl you, find you in the registries and searches they check, and trust what they find.

  • Sitemap present & freshrequired4/4

    Sitemap at https://trydock.ai/sitemap.xml: 831 entries, freshest <lastmod> 2026-08-14 (4 days ago)

    Resolved the sitemap from robots.txt or /sitemap.xml, validated XML, and checked lastmod freshness

    spec ↗
  • Brand search discoverabilityrequired2/4

    Search "Dock agent tools" cited trydock.ai (https://trydock.ai/docs/mcp/tools, https://trydock.ai/docs/agent-prompt, https://trydock.ai/docs, https://trydock.ai/docs/agents, https://trydock.ai/docs/mcp/overview), but search "Dock" did not cite your domain

    fix → Your domain doesn't surface when agents search "Dock". Strengthen brand pages, structured data, and third-party citations (docs portals, GitHub, directories).

    Ran clean brand-name web searches and checked whether your domain is cited in the results

  • MCP registry listingsrecommended4/4

    /.well-known/mcp/server-card.json serves JSON; searched "trydock.ai" and "Dock": listed in official MCP registry (1 of 3 reachable registries)

    Queried the official MCP registry, Smithery, Glama, and PulseMCP for servers matching your domain

    spec ↗

2.Do you welcome agents?

11/16

Whether your robots policy, bot protection, and agent guidance actively admit AI agents instead of blocking them.

  • robots.txt present & parseablerequired2/2

    /robots.txt parses: 11 User-agent group(s), 1 Sitemap line(s)

    Fetched /robots.txt and validated it parses as a robots policy

    spec ↗
  • AI crawler policyrequired5/5

    All 12 AI crawler user-agents (GPTBot, ClaudeBot, PerplexityBot, …) are allowed at / by robots.txt

    Evaluated robots.txt groups for the major AI agent user-agents (GPTBot, ClaudeBot, PerplexityBot, …)

  • Content Signals directivesemerging0/2

    No Content-Signal lines in robots.txt

    fix → Declare Content Signals in robots.txt (e.g. `Content-Signal: search=yes, ai-train=no`) to express AI usage preferences machine-readably.

    Looked for Content-Signal lines in robots.txt

    spec ↗
  • Agent user-agent paritybetarequired4/4

    All three UAs get HTTP 200; bot bodies are ClaudeBot 100%, GPTBot 100% of the browser response (86786 bytes)

    Compared responses served to browser and AI-agent user-agents (informational while in beta)

  • agents.mdrecommended0/3

    No agents.md: https://trydock.ai/agents.md → HTTP 404, https://trydock.ai/AGENTS.md → HTTP 404

    fix → Add /agents.md: what agents may do on your site, key URLs, auth, rate limits, and who to contact.

    Fetched /agents.md and checked for substantive agent guidance

    spec ↗

3.Does an agent understand who you are and what you do?

11/18

Whether your pages carry machine-readable identity: structured data, llms.txt, clear copy an agent can quote.

  • Homepage states what you arerequired3/3

    Homepage clarity rated 5/5 — an agent can confidently say what this company does (model's one-sentence read: "Dock is a cloud-hosted shared workspace where humans and AI agents collaborate in real-time on structured data and rich-text documents, with agents acting as first-class identities.")

    An LLM read your homepage as an agent would and rated how confidently it could say what you do

  • OpenGraph / social metadatarecommended2/2

    Homepage has og:title, og:description, and og:image (twitter:card="summary_large_image" present)

    Parsed homepage og:title / og:description / og:image and twitter:card meta tags

    spec ↗
  • llms.txtrecommended4/4

    /llms.txt is valid llmstxt.org shape: H1 "Dock", 550 markdown link(s)

    Fetched /llms.txt and validated it against the llmstxt.org shape (H1, summary, curated links)

    spec ↗
  • llms-full.txtbonusrecommended2/2

    /llms-full.txt serves 10477 chars of markdown

    Fetched /llms-full.txt and checked for substantial inline markdown content

    spec ↗
  • JSON-LD structured datarequired0/4

    No application/ld+json blocks found on homepage and pricing page

    fix → Embed Organization + WebSite JSON-LD on your homepage (name, url, logo, sameAs) and Product/Offer JSON-LD on pricing.

    Extracted and validated application/ld+json blocks on the homepage and pricing page

    spec ↗
  • Markdown content negotiationrecommended0/3

    GET / with `Accept: text/markdown` returned HTTP 200 text/html; no .md twins found (2 probed)

    fix → Serve text/markdown when clients send `Accept: text/markdown` (or expose .md twins of key pages) — agents get far more signal per token.

    Requested key pages with Accept: text/markdown and probed .md twin URLs

4.Can an agent integrate with you?

watch →15/21

Whether the artifacts an agent needs to build on you — docs, API specs, SDKs, MCP servers — exist and are findable.

  • Developer resource discoverabilityrecommended1/3

    Search "Dock API documentation" cited no trydock.ai URL — only third-party content describes your API: https://developers.dock.us/llms.txt, https://developers.dock.us/api-reference/introduction, https://api.dock.nu/getting-started/, https://developers.dock.us/introduction, https://developers.dock.us/data-model

    fix → Create a crawlable /docs or developers.trydock.ai hub and link it from your homepage footer so search-grounded agents find your official API docs.

    Searched for your brand with developer-keyword suffixes and checked which official resources are cited

  • OpenAPI spec discoverablerequired5/5

    OpenAPI spec found at https://trydock.ai/openapi.json (version 3.1.0)

    Probed standard OpenAPI locations and docs links for a fetchable, parseable spec

    spec ↗
  • Docs discoverablerequired4/4

    Docs found at https://trydock.ai/docs (via path probe, 5511 chars of readable text)

    Followed homepage nav/footer links and probed /docs, /developers, docs.{domain}

  • MCP server discoveryrequired5/5

    Valid MCP server card at https://trydock.ai/.well-known/mcp/server-card.json: name "ai.trydock/dock", endpoint https://trydock.ai/api/mcp

    Probed /.well-known/mcp/server-card.json, mcp.json, and docs mentions for an MCP endpoint

    spec ↗
  • npm SDKrecommended0/2

    No official npm SDK found: probed 6 candidate(s) (@dock/sdk, @dock/dock, dock, dock-sdk, dock-api, dock-js) — found but not domain-verified: dock

    fix → Publish an official npm SDK (suggest @dock/sdk) with your domain in package.json homepage so agents can verify it's official.

    Searched the npm registry for an official, domain-verified SDK package

  • PyPI SDKrecommended0/2

    No official PyPI SDK found: probed 4 candidate(s) (dock, dock-sdk, dockapi, dock-python) — found but not domain-verified: dock, dock-python

    fix → Publish an official Python SDK (suggest "dock") with your domain in the project URLs so agents can verify it's official.

    Searched PyPI for an official, domain-verified SDK package

5.Is your integration well-built?

watch →8.5/11

Whether your specs, docs, and tools are complete and descriptive enough for an agent to use them without guessing.

  • OpenAPI validity & qualityrecommended3/3

    Spec at https://trydock.ai/openapi.json: 6/7 quality criteria passed (60 paths, 87 operations) — failing: ≥ 70% of operations have operationId

    Linted the spec: descriptions, operationIds, securitySchemes, servers

  • Docs qualityrecommended2/3

    Docs at https://trydock.ai/docs scored clarity 3/5, completeness 2/5, runnable examples 4/5, agent-friendliness 4/5 (mean 3.3/5)

    fix → Docs scored 2/5 on completeness. The documentation explicitly states it is outdated and points to a 'Help Center' which is not provided, creating a significant gap in completeness and reliability for an integrating agent.

    An LLM rated your docs for clarity, completeness, runnable examples, and agent-friendliness

  • Quickstart / getting startedrecommended2/2

    Quickstart found: https://trydock.ai/docs/quickstart (linked from https://trydock.ai/docs) returns 200 with a code block

    Looked for a quickstart/getting-started guide containing code blocks

  • MCP tool qualityrecommended1.5/3

    68 tools listed at https://trydock.ai/api/mcp — every tool passes lint, but the count is outside the 1–40 range agents handle well

    fix → Trim or namespace your tool list to ≤40 tools; oversized tool lists degrade agent tool selection.

    Linted listed tools for descriptions, typed input schemas, and naming

6.Can an agent use you reliably in production?

watch →4/4

Response hygiene, TLS and redirect discipline, and security contact channels agents depend on at runtime.

  • TLS & redirect hygienerequired2/2

    http://trydock.ai/ upgrades to https in 1 hop(s), 1 redirect(s) total, final HTTP 200; HSTS present

    Checked http→https redirect behavior, chain length, and TLS health

  • Response speed & weightrequired1/1

    Homepage TTFB 82ms, payload 85KB, Content-Encoding: br

    Measured homepage TTFB, payload size, and compression

  • security.txtrecommended1/1

    Valid security.txt at https://trydock.ai/.well-known/security.txt: Contact mailto:security@trydock.ai, Expires 2027-05-19

    Fetched /.well-known/security.txt and validated Contact + Expires

    spec ↗

7.Can an agent authenticate to you?

watch →7/7

Whether agents can discover your auth model machine-readably (OAuth metadata) and follow documented steps to credentials.

  • OAuth authorization server metadatarecommended3/3

    Valid RFC 8414 metadata at https://trydock.ai/.well-known/oauth-authorization-server: issuer https://trydock.ai, PKCE S256, dynamic client registration at https://trydock.ai/oauth/register

    Fetched /.well-known/oauth-authorization-server (and openid-configuration fallback)

    spec ↗
  • OAuth protected resource metadatarecommended2/2

    Valid RFC 9728 metadata at https://trydock.ai/.well-known/oauth-protected-resource: resource https://trydock.ai/api/mcp, 1 authorization server(s) (https://trydock.ai)

    Fetched /.well-known/oauth-protected-resource

    spec ↗
  • Auth documentationrecommended2/2

    Auth documentation found at https://trydock.ai/docs/agent-prompt (linked from https://trydock.ai/docs) with code examples

    Looked for /auth.md or an authentication docs page with code examples

8.Can an agent transact with you?

watch →10/15

Whether pricing is discoverable and machine-readable, and whether you support agent payment protocols.

  • Pricing discoverablerequired5/5

    Pricing page found at https://trydock.ai/pricing (via path probe) with legible price signals ("$0Your first agents, your firs").

    Followed nav/footer links and probed /pricing for a page with legible price signals

  • Machine-readable pricingrecommended5/5

    LLM extracted 3 numerically-priced plan(s) from https://trydock.ai/pricing at confidence 1.00: Free $ 0/month; Pro $ 19/month; Scale $ 49/month.

    Looked for Offer JSON-LD, then had an LLM attempt structured extraction of your plans

    spec ↗
  • x402 payment supportbonusrecommended0/2

    /.well-known/x402 returned HTTP 200 but not JSON. API probe GET https://trydock.ai/api/me returned HTTP 401 without x402 payment requirements. No x402 support detected (bonus check — absence costs nothing).

    fix → Support x402: serve payment requirements at /.well-known/x402, or answer unauthenticated API calls with HTTP 402 plus an x402 payment-requirements payload (x402Version, accepts[]).

    Probed /.well-known/x402 and API endpoints for HTTP 402 payment-required envelopes

    spec ↗
  • AP2 readinessemerging0/1

    No AP2 hints found — scanned llms.txt, docs page (https://trydock.ai/docs), OpenAPI spec (https://trydock.ai/openapi.json); /.well-known/ap2 returned HTTP 200.

    fix → Adopt AP2 to accept delegated agent payments — see https://ap2-protocol.org.

    Scanned fetched artifacts and well-known paths for AP2 hints

    spec ↗
  • Agentic Commerce Protocolemerging0/1

    No Agentic Commerce Protocol hints found — scanned llms.txt, docs page (https://trydock.ai/docs), OpenAPI spec (https://trydock.ai/openapi.json); /.well-known/acp returned HTTP 200.

    fix → Adopt the Agentic Commerce Protocol so agent checkouts can complete against your store — see https://developers.openai.com/commerce.

    Scanned docs and specs for agentic checkout endpoints

    spec ↗
  • Other agent payment protocolsbonusemerging0/1

    No UCP/MPP hints found — scanned llms.txt, docs page (https://trydock.ai/docs), OpenAPI spec (https://trydock.ai/openapi.json).

    fix → Track emerging agent payment protocols (UCP, MPP) and adopt the ones your buyers' agents use.

    Scanned fetched artifacts for UCP/MPP protocol hints

9.Can a user act through an agent?

4/4

Whether an end user's agent can operate on their behalf: working MCP tools, published skills, agent configs.

  • Agent skill publishedbonusemergingna

    Requires the analysis phase — not yet evaluated

    Checked /skill.md, /.well-known/skills/, and skills.sh for published agent skills

  • MCP handshake & tools listrequired4/4

    MCP handshake OK at https://trydock.ai/api/mcp: server "dock" (protocol 2025-06-18), 68 tool(s) listed

    Performed a streamable-HTTP initialize + tools/list against the MCP endpoint

    spec ↗
  • Agent configs in public repobonusemergingna

    Requires the analysis phase — not yet evaluated

    Checked your public GitHub org's main repos for AGENTS.md / .claude / .cursor configs

10.Can an agent operate your website directly?

3/9

Whether the site itself is legible to non-rendering and browser agents: semantic HTML, no JS walls, accessibility.

  • NLWeb endpointemerging0/1

    No NLWeb endpoint detected: /.well-known/nlweb.json returned HTTP 200 (text/html); GET /ask?query=hello returned HTTP 404 (text/html)

    fix → Consider exposing an NLWeb /ask endpoint (and /.well-known/nlweb.json) for conversational access to your content.

    Probed /.well-known/nlweb.json and the /ask endpoint

    spec ↗
  • Semantic HTML structurerequired0/3

    Only 2/6 semantic signals present on the homepage (missing: <main> landmark, <header>/<footer>, no heading-level skips, text-to-markup ratio ≥ 0.10)

    fix → Add landmark elements and a clean heading hierarchy — missing: <main> landmark, <header>/<footer>, no heading-level skips, text-to-markup ratio ≥ 0.10.

    Scored landmark elements, heading hierarchy, and text-to-markup ratio on the homepage

  • Content readable without JavaScriptrequired1/2

    Homepage raw HTML contains only 625 chars of visible text (target ≥800)

    fix → Only 625 chars of your homepage are readable without JavaScript. Server-render or prerender key pages — most agent fetchers don't execute JS.

    Measured visible text in the raw, unrendered homepage HTML

  • Accessibility basicsrequired2/2

    Homepage accessibility: 4/5 checks passed — failing: labeled inputs (1/1 unlabeled)

    Static checks: lang attribute, title, alt coverage, labeled inputs, landmarks

  • WebMCPemerging0/1

    No WebMCP evidence on homepage: no application/webmcp script and no navigator.modelContext reference

    fix → Consider WebMCP to expose page actions as tools to browser agents.

    Looked for WebMCP script declarations on the homepage

    spec ↗