trydock.ai
agent readiness score · scanned Aug 18, 2026 · 8s · Agent Tools
#51 of 979 · #7 in category
Dock is a cloud-hosted shared workspace where humans and AI agents collaborate in real-time on structured data and rich-text documents, with agents acting as first-class identities.
Discovery 16/20
Access 19.6/30
Usability 31.7/40
Payments 10/10
Top fixes
- +4.6
JSON-LD structured data
Embed Organization + WebSite JSON-LD on your homepage (name, url, logo, sameAs) and Product/Offer JSON-LD on pricing.
- +3.5
Semantic HTML structure
Add landmark elements and a clean heading hierarchy — missing: <main> landmark, <header>/<footer>, no heading-level skips, text-to-markup ratio ≥ 0.10.
- +3.5
Markdown content negotiation
Serve text/markdown when clients send `Accept: text/markdown` (or expose .md twins of key pages) — agents get far more signal per token.
- +2.6
agents.md
Add /agents.md: what agents may do on your site, key URLs, auth, rate limits, and who to contact.
- +2
Brand search discoverability
Your domain doesn't surface when agents search "Dock". Strengthen brand pages, structured data, and third-party citations (docs portals, GitHub, directories).
- +2
Developer resource discoverability
Create a crawlable /docs or developers.trydock.ai hub and link it from your homepage footer so search-grounded agents find your official API docs.
1.Can an agent discover and trust you?
10/12
1.Can an agent discover and trust you?
Whether agents can crawl you, find you in the registries and searches they check, and trust what they find.
✓Sitemap present & fresh4/4
Sitemap at https://trydock.ai/sitemap.xml: 831 entries, freshest <lastmod> 2026-08-14 (4 days ago)
Resolved the sitemap from robots.txt or /sitemap.xml, validated XML, and checked lastmod freshness
spec ↗◐Brand search discoverability2/4
Search "Dock agent tools" cited trydock.ai (https://trydock.ai/docs/mcp/tools, https://trydock.ai/docs/agent-prompt, https://trydock.ai/docs, https://trydock.ai/docs/agents, https://trydock.ai/docs/mcp/overview), but search "Dock" did not cite your domain
fix → Your domain doesn't surface when agents search "Dock". Strengthen brand pages, structured data, and third-party citations (docs portals, GitHub, directories).
Ran clean brand-name web searches and checked whether your domain is cited in the results
✓MCP registry listings4/4
/.well-known/mcp/server-card.json serves JSON; searched "trydock.ai" and "Dock": listed in official MCP registry (1 of 3 reachable registries)
Queried the official MCP registry, Smithery, Glama, and PulseMCP for servers matching your domain
spec ↗
2.Do you welcome agents?
11/16
2.Do you welcome agents?
Whether your robots policy, bot protection, and agent guidance actively admit AI agents instead of blocking them.
✓robots.txt present & parseable2/2
/robots.txt parses: 11 User-agent group(s), 1 Sitemap line(s)
Fetched /robots.txt and validated it parses as a robots policy
spec ↗✓AI crawler policy5/5
All 12 AI crawler user-agents (GPTBot, ClaudeBot, PerplexityBot, …) are allowed at / by robots.txt
Evaluated robots.txt groups for the major AI agent user-agents (GPTBot, ClaudeBot, PerplexityBot, …)
✗Content Signals directives0/2
No Content-Signal lines in robots.txt
fix → Declare Content Signals in robots.txt (e.g. `Content-Signal: search=yes, ai-train=no`) to express AI usage preferences machine-readably.
Looked for Content-Signal lines in robots.txt
spec ↗✓Agent user-agent parity4/4
All three UAs get HTTP 200; bot bodies are ClaudeBot 100%, GPTBot 100% of the browser response (86786 bytes)
Compared responses served to browser and AI-agent user-agents (informational while in beta)
✗agents.md0/3
No agents.md: https://trydock.ai/agents.md → HTTP 404, https://trydock.ai/AGENTS.md → HTTP 404
fix → Add /agents.md: what agents may do on your site, key URLs, auth, rate limits, and who to contact.
Fetched /agents.md and checked for substantive agent guidance
spec ↗
3.Does an agent understand who you are and what you do?
11/18
3.Does an agent understand who you are and what you do?
Whether your pages carry machine-readable identity: structured data, llms.txt, clear copy an agent can quote.
✓Homepage states what you are3/3
Homepage clarity rated 5/5 — an agent can confidently say what this company does (model's one-sentence read: "Dock is a cloud-hosted shared workspace where humans and AI agents collaborate in real-time on structured data and rich-text documents, with agents acting as first-class identities.")
An LLM read your homepage as an agent would and rated how confidently it could say what you do
✓OpenGraph / social metadata2/2
Homepage has og:title, og:description, and og:image (twitter:card="summary_large_image" present)
Parsed homepage og:title / og:description / og:image and twitter:card meta tags
spec ↗✓llms.txt4/4
/llms.txt is valid llmstxt.org shape: H1 "Dock", 550 markdown link(s)
Fetched /llms.txt and validated it against the llmstxt.org shape (H1, summary, curated links)
spec ↗✓llms-full.txt2/2
/llms-full.txt serves 10477 chars of markdown
Fetched /llms-full.txt and checked for substantial inline markdown content
spec ↗✗JSON-LD structured data0/4
No application/ld+json blocks found on homepage and pricing page
fix → Embed Organization + WebSite JSON-LD on your homepage (name, url, logo, sameAs) and Product/Offer JSON-LD on pricing.
Extracted and validated application/ld+json blocks on the homepage and pricing page
spec ↗✗Markdown content negotiation0/3
GET / with `Accept: text/markdown` returned HTTP 200 text/html; no .md twins found (2 probed)
fix → Serve text/markdown when clients send `Accept: text/markdown` (or expose .md twins of key pages) — agents get far more signal per token.
Requested key pages with Accept: text/markdown and probed .md twin URLs
4.Can an agent integrate with you?
watch →15/21
4.Can an agent integrate with you?
Whether the artifacts an agent needs to build on you — docs, API specs, SDKs, MCP servers — exist and are findable.
◐Developer resource discoverability1/3
Search "Dock API documentation" cited no trydock.ai URL — only third-party content describes your API: https://developers.dock.us/llms.txt, https://developers.dock.us/api-reference/introduction, https://api.dock.nu/getting-started/, https://developers.dock.us/introduction, https://developers.dock.us/data-model
fix → Create a crawlable /docs or developers.trydock.ai hub and link it from your homepage footer so search-grounded agents find your official API docs.
Searched for your brand with developer-keyword suffixes and checked which official resources are cited
✓OpenAPI spec discoverable5/5
OpenAPI spec found at https://trydock.ai/openapi.json (version 3.1.0)
Probed standard OpenAPI locations and docs links for a fetchable, parseable spec
spec ↗✓Docs discoverable4/4
Docs found at https://trydock.ai/docs (via path probe, 5511 chars of readable text)
Followed homepage nav/footer links and probed /docs, /developers, docs.{domain}
✓MCP server discovery5/5
Valid MCP server card at https://trydock.ai/.well-known/mcp/server-card.json: name "ai.trydock/dock", endpoint https://trydock.ai/api/mcp
Probed /.well-known/mcp/server-card.json, mcp.json, and docs mentions for an MCP endpoint
spec ↗✗npm SDK0/2
No official npm SDK found: probed 6 candidate(s) (@dock/sdk, @dock/dock, dock, dock-sdk, dock-api, dock-js) — found but not domain-verified: dock
fix → Publish an official npm SDK (suggest @dock/sdk) with your domain in package.json homepage so agents can verify it's official.
Searched the npm registry for an official, domain-verified SDK package
✗PyPI SDK0/2
No official PyPI SDK found: probed 4 candidate(s) (dock, dock-sdk, dockapi, dock-python) — found but not domain-verified: dock, dock-python
fix → Publish an official Python SDK (suggest "dock") with your domain in the project URLs so agents can verify it's official.
Searched PyPI for an official, domain-verified SDK package
5.Is your integration well-built?
watch →8.5/11
5.Is your integration well-built?
Whether your specs, docs, and tools are complete and descriptive enough for an agent to use them without guessing.
✓OpenAPI validity & quality3/3
Spec at https://trydock.ai/openapi.json: 6/7 quality criteria passed (60 paths, 87 operations) — failing: ≥ 70% of operations have operationId
Linted the spec: descriptions, operationIds, securitySchemes, servers
◐Docs quality2/3
Docs at https://trydock.ai/docs scored clarity 3/5, completeness 2/5, runnable examples 4/5, agent-friendliness 4/5 (mean 3.3/5)
fix → Docs scored 2/5 on completeness. The documentation explicitly states it is outdated and points to a 'Help Center' which is not provided, creating a significant gap in completeness and reliability for an integrating agent.
An LLM rated your docs for clarity, completeness, runnable examples, and agent-friendliness
✓Quickstart / getting started2/2
Quickstart found: https://trydock.ai/docs/quickstart (linked from https://trydock.ai/docs) returns 200 with a code block
Looked for a quickstart/getting-started guide containing code blocks
◐MCP tool quality1.5/3
68 tools listed at https://trydock.ai/api/mcp — every tool passes lint, but the count is outside the 1–40 range agents handle well
fix → Trim or namespace your tool list to ≤40 tools; oversized tool lists degrade agent tool selection.
Linted listed tools for descriptions, typed input schemas, and naming
6.Can an agent use you reliably in production?
watch →4/4
6.Can an agent use you reliably in production?
Response hygiene, TLS and redirect discipline, and security contact channels agents depend on at runtime.
✓TLS & redirect hygiene2/2
http://trydock.ai/ upgrades to https in 1 hop(s), 1 redirect(s) total, final HTTP 200; HSTS present
Checked http→https redirect behavior, chain length, and TLS health
✓Response speed & weight1/1
Homepage TTFB 82ms, payload 85KB, Content-Encoding: br
Measured homepage TTFB, payload size, and compression
✓security.txt1/1
Valid security.txt at https://trydock.ai/.well-known/security.txt: Contact mailto:security@trydock.ai, Expires 2027-05-19
Fetched /.well-known/security.txt and validated Contact + Expires
spec ↗
7.Can an agent authenticate to you?
watch →7/7
7.Can an agent authenticate to you?
Whether agents can discover your auth model machine-readably (OAuth metadata) and follow documented steps to credentials.
✓OAuth authorization server metadata3/3
Valid RFC 8414 metadata at https://trydock.ai/.well-known/oauth-authorization-server: issuer https://trydock.ai, PKCE S256, dynamic client registration at https://trydock.ai/oauth/register
Fetched /.well-known/oauth-authorization-server (and openid-configuration fallback)
spec ↗✓OAuth protected resource metadata2/2
Valid RFC 9728 metadata at https://trydock.ai/.well-known/oauth-protected-resource: resource https://trydock.ai/api/mcp, 1 authorization server(s) (https://trydock.ai)
Fetched /.well-known/oauth-protected-resource
spec ↗✓Auth documentation2/2
Auth documentation found at https://trydock.ai/docs/agent-prompt (linked from https://trydock.ai/docs) with code examples
Looked for /auth.md or an authentication docs page with code examples
8.Can an agent transact with you?
watch →10/15
8.Can an agent transact with you?
Whether pricing is discoverable and machine-readable, and whether you support agent payment protocols.
✓Pricing discoverable5/5
Pricing page found at https://trydock.ai/pricing (via path probe) with legible price signals ("$0Your first agents, your firs").
Followed nav/footer links and probed /pricing for a page with legible price signals
✓Machine-readable pricing5/5
LLM extracted 3 numerically-priced plan(s) from https://trydock.ai/pricing at confidence 1.00: Free $ 0/month; Pro $ 19/month; Scale $ 49/month.
Looked for Offer JSON-LD, then had an LLM attempt structured extraction of your plans
spec ↗✗x402 payment support0/2
/.well-known/x402 returned HTTP 200 but not JSON. API probe GET https://trydock.ai/api/me returned HTTP 401 without x402 payment requirements. No x402 support detected (bonus check — absence costs nothing).
fix → Support x402: serve payment requirements at /.well-known/x402, or answer unauthenticated API calls with HTTP 402 plus an x402 payment-requirements payload (x402Version, accepts[]).
Probed /.well-known/x402 and API endpoints for HTTP 402 payment-required envelopes
spec ↗✗AP2 readiness0/1
No AP2 hints found — scanned llms.txt, docs page (https://trydock.ai/docs), OpenAPI spec (https://trydock.ai/openapi.json); /.well-known/ap2 returned HTTP 200.
fix → Adopt AP2 to accept delegated agent payments — see https://ap2-protocol.org.
Scanned fetched artifacts and well-known paths for AP2 hints
spec ↗✗Agentic Commerce Protocol0/1
No Agentic Commerce Protocol hints found — scanned llms.txt, docs page (https://trydock.ai/docs), OpenAPI spec (https://trydock.ai/openapi.json); /.well-known/acp returned HTTP 200.
fix → Adopt the Agentic Commerce Protocol so agent checkouts can complete against your store — see https://developers.openai.com/commerce.
Scanned docs and specs for agentic checkout endpoints
spec ↗✗Other agent payment protocols0/1
No UCP/MPP hints found — scanned llms.txt, docs page (https://trydock.ai/docs), OpenAPI spec (https://trydock.ai/openapi.json).
fix → Track emerging agent payment protocols (UCP, MPP) and adopt the ones your buyers' agents use.
Scanned fetched artifacts for UCP/MPP protocol hints
9.Can a user act through an agent?
4/4
9.Can a user act through an agent?
Whether an end user's agent can operate on their behalf: working MCP tools, published skills, agent configs.
—Agent skill publishedna
Requires the analysis phase — not yet evaluated
Checked /skill.md, /.well-known/skills/, and skills.sh for published agent skills
✓MCP handshake & tools list4/4
MCP handshake OK at https://trydock.ai/api/mcp: server "dock" (protocol 2025-06-18), 68 tool(s) listed
Performed a streamable-HTTP initialize + tools/list against the MCP endpoint
spec ↗—Agent configs in public repona
Requires the analysis phase — not yet evaluated
Checked your public GitHub org's main repos for AGENTS.md / .claude / .cursor configs
10.Can an agent operate your website directly?
3/9
10.Can an agent operate your website directly?
Whether the site itself is legible to non-rendering and browser agents: semantic HTML, no JS walls, accessibility.
✗NLWeb endpoint0/1
No NLWeb endpoint detected: /.well-known/nlweb.json returned HTTP 200 (text/html); GET /ask?query=hello returned HTTP 404 (text/html)
fix → Consider exposing an NLWeb /ask endpoint (and /.well-known/nlweb.json) for conversational access to your content.
Probed /.well-known/nlweb.json and the /ask endpoint
spec ↗✗Semantic HTML structure0/3
Only 2/6 semantic signals present on the homepage (missing: <main> landmark, <header>/<footer>, no heading-level skips, text-to-markup ratio ≥ 0.10)
fix → Add landmark elements and a clean heading hierarchy — missing: <main> landmark, <header>/<footer>, no heading-level skips, text-to-markup ratio ≥ 0.10.
Scored landmark elements, heading hierarchy, and text-to-markup ratio on the homepage
◐Content readable without JavaScript1/2
Homepage raw HTML contains only 625 chars of visible text (target ≥800)
fix → Only 625 chars of your homepage are readable without JavaScript. Server-render or prerender key pages — most agent fetchers don't execute JS.
Measured visible text in the raw, unrendered homepage HTML
✓Accessibility basics2/2
Homepage accessibility: 4/5 checks passed — failing: labeled inputs (1/1 unlabeled)
Static checks: lang attribute, title, alt coverage, labeled inputs, landmarks
✗WebMCP0/1
No WebMCP evidence on homepage: no application/webmcp script and no navigator.modelContext reference
fix → Consider WebMCP to expose page actions as tools to browser agents.
Looked for WebMCP script declarations on the homepage
spec ↗