thecontextcompany.com

agent readiness score · scanned Aug 18, 2026 · 7s · Developer Tools

#124 of 979 · #33 in category

69/ 100C+

The Context Company provides an AI observability platform for monitoring AI agents in production, understanding user behavior, and improving customer outcomes.

badge

Discovery 16.9/20

Access 24.8/30

Usability 17.1/40

Payments 10/10

Top fixes

  1. MCP server discovery

    Publish /.well-known/mcp/server-card.json describing your MCP endpoint so agents can autodiscover it. Evidence found: none.

    +14.3
  2. Docs quality

    Docs scored 0/5 on runnable examples. The documentation is incomplete, as it explicitly states to fetch the complete index from a file that is not provided in the given context.

    +8.6
  3. AI crawler policy

    robots.txt blocks GPTBot, ClaudeBot, Google-Extended, CCBot, meta-externalagent, Bytespider. Add explicit `User-agent: <bot>` / `Allow: /` groups for the AI agents you welcome; a blanket Disallow makes you invisible to them.

    +5.8
  4. Brand search discoverability

    Your domain doesn't surface when agents search "The Context Company developer tools". Strengthen brand pages, structured data, and third-party citations (docs portals, GitHub, directories).

    +3.1
  5. Semantic HTML structure

    Add the missing structure: <header>/<footer>, text-to-markup ratio ≥ 0.10. Agents parse structure, not pixels.

    +1.7

1.Can an agent discover and trust you?

6/8

Whether agents can crawl you, find you in the registries and searches they check, and trust what they find.

  • Sitemap present & freshrequired4/4

    Sitemap at https://thecontextcompany.com/sitemap.xml: 219 entries, freshest <lastmod> 2026-08-10 (8 days ago)

    Resolved the sitemap from robots.txt or /sitemap.xml, validated XML, and checked lastmod freshness

    spec ↗
  • Brand search discoverabilityrequired2/4

    Search "The Context Company" cited thecontextcompany.com (https://docs.thecontextcompany.com/llms.txt, https://www.thecontextcompany.com/solutions), but search "The Context Company developer tools" did not cite your domain

    fix → Your domain doesn't surface when agents search "The Context Company developer tools". Strengthen brand pages, structured data, and third-party citations (docs portals, GitHub, directories).

    Ran clean brand-name web searches and checked whether your domain is cited in the results

  • MCP registry listingsrecommendedna

    No MCP server detected for this product

    Queried the official MCP registry, Smithery, Glama, and PulseMCP for servers matching your domain

    spec ↗

2.Do you welcome agents?

3/13

Whether your robots policy, bot protection, and agent guidance actively admit AI agents instead of blocking them.

  • robots.txt present & parseablerequired2/2

    /robots.txt parses: 10 User-agent group(s), 0 Sitemap line(s)

    Fetched /robots.txt and validated it parses as a robots policy

    spec ↗
  • AI crawler policyrequired0/5

    robots.txt blocks 6 of 12 AI crawler user-agents from /: GPTBot, ClaudeBot, Google-Extended, CCBot, meta-externalagent, Bytespider

    fix → robots.txt blocks GPTBot, ClaudeBot, Google-Extended, CCBot, meta-externalagent, Bytespider. Add explicit `User-agent: <bot>` / `Allow: /` groups for the AI agents you welcome; a blanket Disallow makes you invisible to them.

    Evaluated robots.txt groups for the major AI agent user-agents (GPTBot, ClaudeBot, PerplexityBot, …)

  • Content Signals directivesemerging1/2

    1 Content-Signal line(s) found in robots.txt but none parse as `key=yes|no` pairs (e.g. `search=yes,ai-train=no,use=reference`)

    fix → Fix the Content-Signal syntax to comma-separated `key=yes|no` pairs, e.g. `Content-Signal: search=yes, ai-train=no`.

    Looked for Content-Signal lines in robots.txt

    spec ↗
  • Agent user-agent paritybetarequired0/4

    Both bot UAs are blocked while the browser UA gets HTTP 200: ClaudeBot → HTTP 403; GPTBot → HTTP 403

    fix → Your WAF serves HTTP 403 / HTTP 403 to ClaudeBot and GPTBot while browsers get 200. Allowlist verified AI crawler UA/IP ranges in your bot-protection rules.

    Compared responses served to browser and AI-agent user-agents (informational while in beta)

  • !agents.mdrecommendederror

    agents.md probes failed at the network layer: https://thecontextcompany.com/agents.md (Request budget exhausted), https://thecontextcompany.com/AGENTS.md (Request budget exhausted)

    Fetched /agents.md and checked for substantive agent guidance

    spec ↗

3.Does an agent understand who you are and what you do?

18/18

Whether your pages carry machine-readable identity: structured data, llms.txt, clear copy an agent can quote.

  • Homepage states what you arerequired3/3

    Homepage clarity rated 5/5 — an agent can confidently say what this company does (model's one-sentence read: "The Context Company provides an AI observability platform for monitoring AI agents in production, understanding user behavior, and improving customer outcomes.")

    An LLM read your homepage as an agent would and rated how confidently it could say what you do

  • OpenGraph / social metadatarecommended2/2

    Homepage has og:title, og:description, and og:image (twitter:card="summary_large_image" present)

    Parsed homepage og:title / og:description / og:image and twitter:card meta tags

    spec ↗
  • llms.txtrecommended4/4

    /llms.txt is valid llmstxt.org shape: H1 "The Context Company", 17 markdown link(s)

    Fetched /llms.txt and validated it against the llmstxt.org shape (H1, summary, curated links)

    spec ↗
  • llms-full.txtbonusrecommended2/2

    /llms-full.txt serves 32481 chars of markdown

    Fetched /llms-full.txt and checked for substantial inline markdown content

    spec ↗
  • JSON-LD structured datarequired4/4

    2 JSON-LD block(s) on homepage and pricing page (types: Organization); Organization block is well-formed

    Extracted and validated application/ld+json blocks on the homepage and pricing page

    spec ↗
  • Markdown content negotiationrecommended3/3

    https://thecontextcompany.com/ returns markdown for `Accept: text/markdown` (content-type text/markdown)

    Requested key pages with Accept: text/markdown and probed .md twin URLs

4.Can an agent integrate with you?

watch →4/9

Whether the artifacts an agent needs to build on you — docs, API specs, SDKs, MCP servers — exist and are findable.

  • Developer resource discoverabilityrecommendedna

    No public API detected

    Searched for your brand with developer-keyword suffixes and checked which official resources are cited

  • OpenAPI spec discoverablerequiredna

    No public developer API detected — API checks don't apply

    Probed standard OpenAPI locations and docs links for a fetchable, parseable spec

    spec ↗
  • Docs discoverablerequired4/4

    Docs found at https://docs.thecontextcompany.com/ (via homepage link, 2197 chars of readable text)

    Followed homepage nav/footer links and probed /docs, /developers, docs.{domain}

  • MCP server discoveryrequired0/5

    No MCP evidence found: probed /.well-known/mcp/server-card.json, /.well-known/mcp.json, /mcp.json and scanned llms.txt, agents.md, and docs for endpoints or install commands

    fix → Publish /.well-known/mcp/server-card.json describing your MCP endpoint so agents can autodiscover it. Evidence found: none.

    Probed /.well-known/mcp/server-card.json, mcp.json, and docs mentions for an MCP endpoint

    spec ↗
  • npm SDKrecommendedna

    No public developer API detected — API checks don't apply

    Searched the npm registry for an official, domain-verified SDK package

  • PyPI SDKrecommendedna

    No public developer API detected — API checks don't apply

    Searched PyPI for an official, domain-verified SDK package

5.Is your integration well-built?

watch →0/3

Whether your specs, docs, and tools are complete and descriptive enough for an agent to use them without guessing.

  • OpenAPI validity & qualityrecommendedna

    No public developer API detected — API checks don't apply

    Linted the spec: descriptions, operationIds, securitySchemes, servers

  • Docs qualityrecommended0/3

    Docs at https://docs.thecontextcompany.com/ scored clarity 4/5, completeness 2/5, runnable examples 0/5, agent-friendliness 3/5 (mean 2.3/5)

    fix → Docs scored 0/5 on runnable examples. The documentation is incomplete, as it explicitly states to fetch the complete index from a file that is not provided in the given context.

    An LLM rated your docs for clarity, completeness, runnable examples, and agent-friendliness

  • Quickstart / getting startedrecommendedna

    No public developer API detected — API checks don't apply

    Looked for a quickstart/getting-started guide containing code blocks

  • MCP tool qualityrecommendedna

    No MCP endpoint known — tool lint requires a tools/list

    Linted listed tools for descriptions, typed input schemas, and naming

6.Can an agent use you reliably in production?

watch →3/3

Response hygiene, TLS and redirect discipline, and security contact channels agents depend on at runtime.

  • TLS & redirect hygienerequired2/2

    http://thecontextcompany.com/ upgrades to https in 1 hop(s), 2 redirect(s) total, final HTTP 200; HSTS present

    Checked http→https redirect behavior, chain length, and TLS health

  • Response speed & weightrequired1/1

    Homepage TTFB 858ms, payload 173KB, Content-Encoding: br

    Measured homepage TTFB, payload size, and compression

  • !security.txtrecommendederror

    Fetch of https://thecontextcompany.com/.well-known/security.txt failed at the network layer (Request budget exhausted)

    Fetched /.well-known/security.txt and validated Contact + Expires

    spec ↗

7.Can an agent authenticate to you?

watch →

Whether agents can discover your auth model machine-readably (OAuth metadata) and follow documented steps to credentials.

  • OAuth authorization server metadatarecommendedna

    No API or MCP server detected — OAuth metadata doesn't apply

    Fetched /.well-known/oauth-authorization-server (and openid-configuration fallback)

    spec ↗
  • OAuth protected resource metadatarecommendedna

    No API or MCP server detected — OAuth metadata doesn't apply

    Fetched /.well-known/oauth-protected-resource

    spec ↗
  • Auth documentationrecommendedna

    No public developer API detected — API checks don't apply

    Looked for /auth.md or an authentication docs page with code examples

8.Can an agent transact with you?

watch →10/11

Whether pricing is discoverable and machine-readable, and whether you support agent payment protocols.

  • Pricing discoverablerequired5/5

    Pricing page found at https://www.thecontextcompany.com/pricing (via homepage link) with legible price signals ("$400/month$0.001 / run after 2").

    Followed nav/footer links and probed /pricing for a page with legible price signals

  • Machine-readable pricingrecommended5/5

    LLM extracted 2 numerically-priced plan(s) from https://www.thecontextcompany.com/pricing at confidence 1.00: developer USD 0/month; pro USD 400/month; custom (contact sales).

    Looked for Offer JSON-LD, then had an LLM attempt structured extraction of your plans

    spec ↗
  • !x402 payment supportbonusrecommendederror

    Could not fetch /.well-known/x402 (Request budget exhausted).

    Probed /.well-known/x402 and API endpoints for HTTP 402 payment-required envelopes

    spec ↗
  • !AP2 readinessemergingerror

    Could not probe /.well-known/ap2: Request budget exhausted; no AP2 hints in fetched artifacts.

    Scanned fetched artifacts and well-known paths for AP2 hints

    spec ↗
  • !Agentic Commerce Protocolemergingerror

    Could not probe /.well-known/acp: Request budget exhausted; no Agentic Commerce Protocol hints in fetched artifacts.

    Scanned docs and specs for agentic checkout endpoints

    spec ↗
  • Other agent payment protocolsbonusemerging0/1

    No UCP/MPP hints found — scanned llms.txt, docs page (https://docs.thecontextcompany.com/).

    fix → Track emerging agent payment protocols (UCP, MPP) and adopt the ones your buyers' agents use.

    Scanned fetched artifacts for UCP/MPP protocol hints

9.Can a user act through an agent?

Whether an end user's agent can operate on their behalf: working MCP tools, published skills, agent configs.

  • Agent skill publishedbonusemergingna

    Requires the analysis phase — not yet evaluated

    Checked /skill.md, /.well-known/skills/, and skills.sh for published agent skills

  • MCP handshake & tools listrequiredna

    No MCP endpoint known — nothing to handshake with

    Performed a streamable-HTTP initialize + tools/list against the MCP endpoint

    spec ↗
  • Agent configs in public repobonusemergingna

    Requires the analysis phase — not yet evaluated

    Checked your public GitHub org's main repos for AGENTS.md / .claude / .cursor configs

10.Can an agent operate your website directly?

5.5/9

Whether the site itself is legible to non-rendering and browser agents: semantic HTML, no JS walls, accessibility.

  • NLWeb endpointemerging0/1

    No NLWeb endpoint detected: /.well-known/nlweb.json returned HTTP 200 (text/html); GET /ask?query=hello returned HTTP 200 (text/html)

    fix → Consider exposing an NLWeb /ask endpoint (and /.well-known/nlweb.json) for conversational access to your content.

    Probed /.well-known/nlweb.json and the /ask endpoint

    spec ↗
  • Semantic HTML structurerequired1.5/3

    4/6 semantic signals present on the homepage (missing: <header>/<footer>, text-to-markup ratio ≥ 0.10)

    fix → Add the missing structure: <header>/<footer>, text-to-markup ratio ≥ 0.10. Agents parse structure, not pixels.

    Scored landmark elements, heading hierarchy, and text-to-markup ratio on the homepage

  • Content readable without JavaScriptrequired2/2

    Homepage raw HTML contains 3924 chars of visible text without JavaScript

    Measured visible text in the raw, unrendered homepage HTML

  • Accessibility basicsrequired2/2

    Homepage accessibility: 5/5 checks passed

    Static checks: lang attribute, title, alt coverage, labeled inputs, landmarks

  • WebMCPemerging0/1

    No WebMCP evidence on homepage: no application/webmcp script and no navigator.modelContext reference

    fix → Consider WebMCP to expose page actions as tools to browser agents.

    Looked for WebMCP script declarations on the homepage

    spec ↗