salesforce.com

Whether agents can crawl you, find you in the registries and searches they check, and trust what they find.

• ✓Sitemap present & freshrequired4/4

  Sitemap at https://www.salesforce.com/sitemap.xml: 172 entries, freshest <lastmod> 2026-08-15 (3 days ago)

  Resolved the sitemap from robots.txt or /sitemap.xml, validated XML, and checked lastmod freshness

  spec ↗report issue
• ✓Brand search discoverabilityrequired4/4

  Both searches ("Salesforce" and "Salesforce crm") cited salesforce.com: http://resources.docs.salesforce.com/198/0/en-us/sfdc/pdf/salesforce_web_integration_links.pdf, https://trailhead.salesforce.com/content/learn/projects/rd-embed-reports-dashboards/rd-create-report-and-dashboard, https://admin.salesforce.com/blog/2021/how-i-solved-this-using-flow-to-create-a-custom-report-link, http://resources.docs.salesforce.com/200/6/en-us/sfdc/pdf/salesforce_analytics_overview_cheatsheet.pdf

  Ran clean brand-name web searches and checked whether your domain is cited in the results

  report issue
• —MCP registry listingsrecommendedna

  No MCP server detected for this product

  Queried the official MCP registry, Smithery, Glama, and PulseMCP for servers matching your domain

  spec ↗report issue

Whether your robots policy, bot protection, and agent guidance actively admit AI agents instead of blocking them.

• ✓robots.txt present & parseablerequired2/2

  /robots.txt parses: 9 User-agent group(s), 52 Sitemap line(s)

  Fetched /robots.txt and validated it parses as a robots policy

  spec ↗report issue
• ✓AI crawler policyrequired5/5

  All 12 AI crawler user-agents (GPTBot, ClaudeBot, PerplexityBot, …) are allowed at / by robots.txt

  Evaluated robots.txt groups for the major AI agent user-agents (GPTBot, ClaudeBot, PerplexityBot, …)

  report issue
• ✗Content Signals directivesemerging0/2

  No Content-Signal lines in robots.txt

  fix → Declare Content Signals in robots.txt (e.g. `Content-Signal: search=yes, ai-train=no`) to express AI usage preferences machine-readably.

  Looked for Content-Signal lines in robots.txt

  spec ↗report issue
• ✗Agent user-agent paritybetarequired0/4

  Both bot UAs are blocked while the browser UA gets HTTP 200: ClaudeBot → HTTP 403; GPTBot → HTTP 403

  fix → Your WAF serves HTTP 403 / HTTP 403 to ClaudeBot and GPTBot while browsers get 200. Allowlist verified AI crawler UA/IP ranges in your bot-protection rules.

  Compared responses served to browser and AI-agent user-agents (informational while in beta)

  report issue
• ✗agents.mdrecommended0/3

  No agents.md: https://salesforce.com/agents.md → HTTP 404, https://salesforce.com/AGENTS.md → HTTP 404

  fix → Add /agents.md: what agents may do on your site, key URLs, auth, rate limits, and who to contact.

  Fetched /agents.md and checked for substantive agent guidance

  spec ↗report issue

Whether your pages carry machine-readable identity: structured data, llms.txt, clear copy an agent can quote.

• ✓Homepage states what you arerequired3/3

  Homepage clarity rated 5/5 — an agent can confidently say what this company does (model's one-sentence read: "Salesforce is the #1 Agentic AI CRM platform that integrates people, agents, apps, and data on a trusted platform to drive customer success and business growth.")

  An LLM read your homepage as an agent would and rated how confidently it could say what you do

  report issue
• ✓OpenGraph / social metadatarecommended2/2

  Homepage has og:title, og:description, and og:image (twitter:card="summary_large_image" present)

  Parsed homepage og:title / og:description / og:image and twitter:card meta tags

  spec ↗report issue
• ◐llms.txtrecommended2/4

  /llms.txt exists (524210 chars) but is missing an H1 as the first non-blank line

  fix → Your /llms.txt is missing an H1 as the first non-blank line. Follow llmstxt.org: start with `# YourName`, add a `>` summary line, then sections of curated links.

  Fetched /llms.txt and validated it against the llmstxt.org shape (H1, summary, curated links)

  spec ↗report issue
• ✗llms-full.txtbonusrecommended0/2

  GET /llms-full.txt returned HTTP 404

  fix → Add /llms-full.txt with expanded inline docs content so agents can load everything in one fetch.

  Fetched /llms-full.txt and checked for substantial inline markdown content

  spec ↗report issue
• ✓JSON-LD structured datarequired4/4

  2 JSON-LD block(s) on homepage and pricing page (types: Organization, WebSite); Organization block is well-formed

  Extracted and validated application/ld+json blocks on the homepage and pricing page

  spec ↗report issue
• ✗Markdown content negotiationrecommended0/3

  GET / with `Accept: text/markdown` returned HTTP 200 text/html; no .md twins found (1 probed)

  fix → Serve text/markdown when clients send `Accept: text/markdown` (or expose .md twins of key pages) — agents get far more signal per token.

  Requested key pages with Accept: text/markdown and probed .md twin URLs

  report issue

Whether the artifacts an agent needs to build on you — docs, API specs, SDKs, MCP servers — exist and are findable.

• —Developer resource discoverabilityrecommendedna

  No public API detected

  Searched for your brand with developer-keyword suffixes and checked which official resources are cited

  report issue
• —OpenAPI spec discoverablerequiredna

  No public developer API detected — API checks don't apply

  Probed standard OpenAPI locations and docs links for a fetchable, parseable spec

  spec ↗report issue
• ◐Docs discoverablerequired2/4

  Docs URL https://developers.salesforce.com/ exists but returned HTTP 403 — readable only behind login

  fix → Make at least a public subset of your docs readable without login; agents cannot complete an auth flow just to read documentation.

  Followed homepage nav/footer links and probed /docs, /developers, docs.{domain}

  report issue
• ◐MCP server discoveryrequired2.5/5

  MCP evidence found only as a mention in llms.txt: "https://www.salesforce.com/agentforce/mcp-support/" — no well-known server card

  fix → Publish /.well-known/mcp/server-card.json describing your MCP endpoint so agents can autodiscover it. Evidence found: llms.txt.

  Probed /.well-known/mcp/server-card.json, mcp.json, and docs mentions for an MCP endpoint

  spec ↗report issue
• —npm SDKrecommendedna

  No public developer API detected — API checks don't apply

  Searched the npm registry for an official, domain-verified SDK package

  report issue
• —PyPI SDKrecommendedna

  No public developer API detected — API checks don't apply

  Searched PyPI for an official, domain-verified SDK package

  report issue

Whether your specs, docs, and tools are complete and descriptive enough for an agent to use them without guessing.

• —OpenAPI validity & qualityrecommendedna

  No public developer API detected — API checks don't apply

  Linted the spec: descriptions, operationIds, securitySchemes, servers

  report issue
• —Docs qualityrecommendedna

  No documentation found to evaluate

  An LLM rated your docs for clarity, completeness, runnable examples, and agent-friendliness

  report issue
• —Quickstart / getting startedrecommendedna

  No public developer API detected — API checks don't apply

  Looked for a quickstart/getting-started guide containing code blocks

  report issue
• —MCP tool qualityrecommendedna

  No tools listed by the MCP endpoint — nothing to lint

  Linted listed tools for descriptions, typed input schemas, and naming

  report issue

Response hygiene, TLS and redirect discipline, and security contact channels agents depend on at runtime.

• ✓TLS & redirect hygienerequired2/2

  http://salesforce.com/ upgrades to https in 1 hop(s), 3 redirect(s) total, final HTTP 200; HSTS present

  Checked http→https redirect behavior, chain length, and TLS health

  report issue
• ✓Response speed & weightrequired1/1

  Homepage TTFB 108ms, payload 516KB, Content-Encoding: gzip

  Measured homepage TTFB, payload size, and compression

  report issue
• !security.txtrecommendederror

  Fetch of https://salesforce.com/.well-known/security.txt failed at the network layer (Request budget exhausted)

  Fetched /.well-known/security.txt and validated Contact + Expires

  spec ↗report issue

Whether agents can discover your auth model machine-readably (OAuth metadata) and follow documented steps to credentials.

• —OAuth authorization server metadatarecommendedna

  No API or MCP server detected — OAuth metadata doesn't apply

  Fetched /.well-known/oauth-authorization-server (and openid-configuration fallback)

  spec ↗report issue
• —OAuth protected resource metadatarecommendedna

  No API or MCP server detected — OAuth metadata doesn't apply

  Fetched /.well-known/oauth-protected-resource

  spec ↗report issue
• —Auth documentationrecommendedna

  No public developer API detected — API checks don't apply

  Looked for /auth.md or an authentication docs page with code examples

  report issue

Whether pricing is discoverable and machine-readable, and whether you support agent payment protocols.

• ✓Pricing discoverablerequired5/5

  Pricing page found at https://www.salesforce.com/small-business/pricing/?bc=DB (via homepage link) with legible price signals ("$ 0 USD/User/Month (2 user lic").

  Followed nav/footer links and probed /pricing for a page with legible price signals

  report issue
• ✓Machine-readable pricingrecommended5/5

  LLM extracted 7 numerically-priced plan(s) from https://www.salesforce.com/small-business/pricing/?bc=DB at confidence 1.00: Free Suite USD 0/Month; Starter Suite USD 25/Month; Pro Suite USD 100/Month; Sales Cloud Enterprise USD 175/Month; Service Cloud Enterprise USD 175/Month; Marketing Cloud Next Growth Edition USD 1500/Month; Commerce Cloud B2B Growth Edition (contact sales); Slack Business+ USD 15/Year.

  Looked for Offer JSON-LD, then had an LLM attempt structured extraction of your plans

  spec ↗report issue
• !x402 payment supportbonusrecommendederror

  Could not fetch /.well-known/x402 (Request budget exhausted).

  Probed /.well-known/x402 and API endpoints for HTTP 402 payment-required envelopes

  spec ↗report issue
• !AP2 readinessemergingerror

  Could not probe /.well-known/ap2: Request budget exhausted; no AP2 hints in fetched artifacts.

  Scanned fetched artifacts and well-known paths for AP2 hints

  spec ↗report issue
• !Agentic Commerce Protocolemergingerror

  Could not probe /.well-known/acp: Request budget exhausted; no Agentic Commerce Protocol hints in fetched artifacts.

  Scanned docs and specs for agentic checkout endpoints

  spec ↗report issue
• ✗Other agent payment protocolsbonusemerging0/1

  No UCP/MPP hints found — scanned llms.txt.

  fix → Track emerging agent payment protocols (UCP, MPP) and adopt the ones your buyers' agents use.

  Scanned fetched artifacts for UCP/MPP protocol hints

  report issue

Whether an end user's agent can operate on their behalf: working MCP tools, published skills, agent configs.

• —Agent skill publishedbonusemergingna

  Requires the analysis phase — not yet evaluated

  Checked /skill.md, /.well-known/skills/, and skills.sh for published agent skills

  report issue
• ✗MCP handshake & tools listrequired0/4

  MCP endpoint https://www.salesforce.com/agentforce/mcp-support/ failed handshake: Not a JSON-RPC endpoint

  fix → MCP endpoint https://www.salesforce.com/agentforce/mcp-support/ failed handshake: Not a JSON-RPC endpoint. Support streamable HTTP with protocol version negotiation; if auth-gated, return RFC 9728 metadata in WWW-Authenticate.

  Performed a streamable-HTTP initialize + tools/list against the MCP endpoint

  spec ↗report issue
• —Agent configs in public repobonusemergingna

  Requires the analysis phase — not yet evaluated

  Checked your public GitHub org's main repos for AGENTS.md / .claude / .cursor configs

  report issue

Whether the site itself is legible to non-rendering and browser agents: semantic HTML, no JS walls, accessibility.

• ✗NLWeb endpointemerging0/1

  No NLWeb endpoint detected: /.well-known/nlweb.json returned HTTP 404 (no content-type); GET /ask?query=hello returned HTTP 404 (no content-type)

  fix → Consider exposing an NLWeb /ask endpoint (and /.well-known/nlweb.json) for conversational access to your content.

  Probed /.well-known/nlweb.json and the /ask endpoint

  spec ↗report issue
• ◐Semantic HTML structurerequired1.5/3

  3/6 semantic signals present on the homepage (missing: <nav> landmark, <header>/<footer>, text-to-markup ratio ≥ 0.10)

  fix → Add the missing structure: <nav> landmark, <header>/<footer>, text-to-markup ratio ≥ 0.10. Agents parse structure, not pixels.

  Scored landmark elements, heading hierarchy, and text-to-markup ratio on the homepage

  report issue
• ✓Content readable without JavaScriptrequired2/2

  Homepage raw HTML contains 8373 chars of visible text without JavaScript

  Measured visible text in the raw, unrendered homepage HTML

  report issue
• ✓Accessibility basicsrequired2/2

  Homepage accessibility: 5/5 checks passed

  Static checks: lang attribute, title, alt coverage, labeled inputs, landmarks

  report issue
• ✗WebMCPemerging0/1

  No WebMCP evidence on homepage: no application/webmcp script and no navigator.modelContext reference

  fix → Consider WebMCP to expose page actions as tools to browser agents.

  Looked for WebMCP script declarations on the homepage

  spec ↗report issue