onelogin.com

Whether agents can crawl you, find you in the registries and searches they check, and trust what they find.

• ◐Sitemap present & freshrequired2/4

  Sitemap at https://onelogin.com/sitemap.xml is valid XML with 5469 entries but contains no <lastmod> dates

  fix → Publish /sitemap.xml, reference it from robots.txt, and include <lastmod> dates so agents can tell what's current. Freshest lastmod seen: none.

  Resolved the sitemap from robots.txt or /sitemap.xml, validated XML, and checked lastmod freshness

  spec ↗report issue
• ✓Brand search discoverabilityrequired4/4

  Both searches ("OneLogin" and "OneLogin security") cited onelogin.com: https://developers.onelogin.com/api-docs/2/reports/run-report, https://developers.onelogin.com/api-docs/2/reports, https://developers.onelogin.com/api-docs/2/reports/run-report-in-background, https://developers.onelogin.com/quickstart/reporting, https://www.onelogin.com/compliance/soc-1-type-2

  Ran clean brand-name web searches and checked whether your domain is cited in the results

  report issue
• —MCP registry listingsrecommendedna

  No MCP server detected for this product

  Queried the official MCP registry, Smithery, Glama, and PulseMCP for servers matching your domain

  spec ↗report issue

Whether your robots policy, bot protection, and agent guidance actively admit AI agents instead of blocking them.

• ◐robots.txt present & parseablerequired1/2

  /robots.txt returned HTTP 200 but looks like an HTML page (content-type text/html), not a robots policy

  fix → Serve /robots.txt as plain text with User-agent groups; an HTML error page there is unparseable to crawlers.

  Fetched /robots.txt and validated it parses as a robots policy

  spec ↗report issue
• ✓AI crawler policyrequired5/5

  /robots.txt is unparseable (looks like HTML) — crawlers treat this as no restrictions, so none of the 12 AI crawler user-agents are blocked

  Evaluated robots.txt groups for the major AI agent user-agents (GPTBot, ClaudeBot, PerplexityBot, …)

  report issue
• ✗Content Signals directivesemerging0/2

  /robots.txt is unparseable, so no Content-Signal lines could be read

  fix → Declare Content Signals in robots.txt (e.g. `Content-Signal: search=yes, ai-train=no`) to express AI usage preferences machine-readably.

  Looked for Content-Signal lines in robots.txt

  spec ↗report issue
• ✗Agent user-agent paritybetarequired0/4

  Both bot UAs are blocked while the browser UA gets HTTP 200: ClaudeBot → HTTP 403; GPTBot → HTTP 403

  fix → Your WAF serves HTTP 403 / HTTP 403 to ClaudeBot and GPTBot while browsers get 200. Allowlist verified AI crawler UA/IP ranges in your bot-protection rules.

  Compared responses served to browser and AI-agent user-agents (informational while in beta)

  report issue
• ✗agents.mdrecommended0/3

  No agents.md: https://onelogin.com/agents.md → HTTP 202, https://onelogin.com/AGENTS.md → HTTP 202

  fix → Add /agents.md: what agents may do on your site, key URLs, auth, rate limits, and who to contact.

  Fetched /agents.md and checked for substantive agent guidance

  spec ↗report issue

Whether your pages carry machine-readable identity: structured data, llms.txt, clear copy an agent can quote.

• ✗Homepage states what you arerequired0/3

  Homepage clarity rated 0/5 — an agent reading your homepage couldn't confidently answer "what does this company do" (model's one-sentence read: "This website is a security challenge page, likely part of a web application firewall (WAF) system, designed to verify that a user is not a robot before granting access to the actual content.")

  fix → Add a literal one-sentence description near the top of your homepage, e.g.: This website is a security challenge page, likely part of a web application firewall (WAF) system, designed to verify that a user is not a robot before granting access to the actual content.

  An LLM read your homepage as an agent would and rated how confidently it could say what you do

  report issue
• ✗OpenGraph / social metadatarecommended0/2

  Homepage HTML contains none of og:title, og:description, og:image (twitter:card absent)

  fix → Add og:title, og:description, and og:image meta tags to your homepage; agents and link unfurlers use them as your canonical summary.

  Parsed homepage og:title / og:description / og:image and twitter:card meta tags

  spec ↗report issue
• ✗llms.txtrecommended0/4

  /llms.txt returned HTML (content-type text/html), not markdown

  fix → Serve /llms.txt as plain markdown — an HTML page there is a routing catch-all, not an llms.txt.

  Fetched /llms.txt and validated it against the llmstxt.org shape (H1, summary, curated links)

  spec ↗report issue
• ✗llms-full.txtbonusrecommended0/2

  /llms-full.txt returned HTML (content-type text/html), not markdown

  fix → Serve /llms-full.txt as plain markdown, not an HTML page.

  Fetched /llms-full.txt and checked for substantial inline markdown content

  spec ↗report issue
• ✗JSON-LD structured datarequired0/4

  No application/ld+json blocks found on homepage and pricing page

  fix → Embed Organization + WebSite JSON-LD on your homepage (name, url, logo, sameAs) and Product/Offer JSON-LD on pricing.

  Extracted and validated application/ld+json blocks on the homepage and pricing page

  spec ↗report issue
• ✗Markdown content negotiationrecommended0/3

  GET / with `Accept: text/markdown` returned HTTP 202 text/html; no .md twins found (1 probed)

  fix → Serve text/markdown when clients send `Accept: text/markdown` (or expose .md twins of key pages) — agents get far more signal per token.

  Requested key pages with Accept: text/markdown and probed .md twin URLs

  report issue

Whether the artifacts an agent needs to build on you — docs, API specs, SDKs, MCP servers — exist and are findable.

• —Developer resource discoverabilityrecommendedna

  No public API detected

  Searched for your brand with developer-keyword suffixes and checked which official resources are cited

  report issue
• —OpenAPI spec discoverablerequiredna

  No public developer API detected — API checks don't apply

  Probed standard OpenAPI locations and docs links for a fetchable, parseable spec

  spec ↗report issue
• ✓Docs discoverablerequired4/4

  Docs found at https://developers.onelogin.com/ (via path probe, 1000 chars of readable text)

  Followed homepage nav/footer links and probed /docs, /developers, docs.{domain}

  report issue
• ✗MCP server discoveryrequired0/5

  No MCP evidence found: probed /.well-known/mcp/server-card.json, /.well-known/mcp.json, /mcp.json and scanned llms.txt, agents.md, and docs for endpoints or install commands

  fix → Publish /.well-known/mcp/server-card.json describing your MCP endpoint so agents can autodiscover it. Evidence found: none.

  Probed /.well-known/mcp/server-card.json, mcp.json, and docs mentions for an MCP endpoint

  spec ↗report issue
• —npm SDKrecommendedna

  No public developer API detected — API checks don't apply

  Searched the npm registry for an official, domain-verified SDK package

  report issue
• —PyPI SDKrecommendedna

  No public developer API detected — API checks don't apply

  Searched PyPI for an official, domain-verified SDK package

  report issue

Whether your specs, docs, and tools are complete and descriptive enough for an agent to use them without guessing.

• —OpenAPI validity & qualityrecommendedna

  No public developer API detected — API checks don't apply

  Linted the spec: descriptions, operationIds, securitySchemes, servers

  report issue
• ◐Docs qualityrecommended1.5/3

  Docs at https://developers.onelogin.com/ scored clarity 3/5, completeness 3/5, runnable examples 2/5, agent-friendliness 2/5 (mean 2.5/5)

  fix → Docs scored 2/5 on runnable examples. The documentation is highly navigational and provides many links, but lacks a clear, step-by-step guide for an agent to begin integration without prior knowledge of OneLogin's ecosystem.

  An LLM rated your docs for clarity, completeness, runnable examples, and agent-friendliness

  report issue
• —Quickstart / getting startedrecommendedna

  No public developer API detected — API checks don't apply

  Looked for a quickstart/getting-started guide containing code blocks

  report issue
• —MCP tool qualityrecommendedna

  No MCP endpoint known — tool lint requires a tools/list

  Linted listed tools for descriptions, typed input schemas, and naming

  report issue

Response hygiene, TLS and redirect discipline, and security contact channels agents depend on at runtime.

• ✓TLS & redirect hygienerequired2/2

  http://onelogin.com/ upgrades to https in 1 hop(s), 2 redirect(s) total, final HTTP 202; no HSTS header

  Checked http→https redirect behavior, chain length, and TLS health

  report issue
• ◐Response speed & weightrequired0.5/1

  Homepage TTFB 47ms, payload 2KB, Content-Encoding: none — one target missed: no Content-Encoding (gzip/br/zstd)

  fix → Fix: no Content-Encoding (gzip/br/zstd). Enable compression and trim payload — agents run on strict timeouts.

  Measured homepage TTFB, payload size, and compression

  report issue
• ✗security.txtrecommended0/1

  https://onelogin.com/.well-known/security.txt returned HTML, not a plaintext security.txt

  fix → Publish RFC 9116 /.well-known/security.txt with a Contact and a future Expires.

  Fetched /.well-known/security.txt and validated Contact + Expires

  spec ↗report issue

Whether agents can discover your auth model machine-readably (OAuth metadata) and follow documented steps to credentials.

• —OAuth authorization server metadatarecommendedna

  No API or MCP server detected — OAuth metadata doesn't apply

  Fetched /.well-known/oauth-authorization-server (and openid-configuration fallback)

  spec ↗report issue
• —OAuth protected resource metadatarecommendedna

  No API or MCP server detected — OAuth metadata doesn't apply

  Fetched /.well-known/oauth-protected-resource

  spec ↗report issue
• —Auth documentationrecommendedna

  No public developer API detected — API checks don't apply

  Looked for /auth.md or an authentication docs page with code examples

  report issue

Whether pricing is discoverable and machine-readable, and whether you support agent payment protocols.

• —Pricing discoverablerequiredna

  Product appears to be free or non-commercial — pricing checks don't apply

  Followed nav/footer links and probed /pricing for a page with legible price signals

  report issue
• —Machine-readable pricingrecommendedna

  Product appears to be free or non-commercial — pricing checks don't apply

  Looked for Offer JSON-LD, then had an LLM attempt structured extraction of your plans

  spec ↗report issue
• ✗x402 payment supportbonusrecommended0/2

  /.well-known/x402 returned HTTP 200 but not JSON. No x402 support detected (bonus check — absence costs nothing).

  fix → Support x402: serve payment requirements at /.well-known/x402, or answer unauthenticated API calls with HTTP 402 plus an x402 payment-requirements payload (x402Version, accepts[]).

  Probed /.well-known/x402 and API endpoints for HTTP 402 payment-required envelopes

  spec ↗report issue
• !AP2 readinessemergingerror

  Could not probe /.well-known/ap2: Request budget exhausted; no AP2 hints in fetched artifacts.

  Scanned fetched artifacts and well-known paths for AP2 hints

  spec ↗report issue
• !Agentic Commerce Protocolemergingerror

  Could not probe /.well-known/acp: Request budget exhausted; no Agentic Commerce Protocol hints in fetched artifacts.

  Scanned docs and specs for agentic checkout endpoints

  spec ↗report issue
• ✗Other agent payment protocolsbonusemerging0/1

  No UCP/MPP hints found — scanned llms.txt, agents.md, docs page (https://developers.onelogin.com/).

  fix → Track emerging agent payment protocols (UCP, MPP) and adopt the ones your buyers' agents use.

  Scanned fetched artifacts for UCP/MPP protocol hints

  report issue

Whether an end user's agent can operate on their behalf: working MCP tools, published skills, agent configs.

• —Agent skill publishedbonusemergingna

  Requires the analysis phase — not yet evaluated

  Checked /skill.md, /.well-known/skills/, and skills.sh for published agent skills

  report issue
• —MCP handshake & tools listrequiredna

  No MCP endpoint known — nothing to handshake with

  Performed a streamable-HTTP initialize + tools/list against the MCP endpoint

  spec ↗report issue
• —Agent configs in public repobonusemergingna

  Requires the analysis phase — not yet evaluated

  Checked your public GitHub org's main repos for AGENTS.md / .claude / .cursor configs

  report issue

Whether the site itself is legible to non-rendering and browser agents: semantic HTML, no JS walls, accessibility.

• ✗NLWeb endpointemerging0/1

  No NLWeb endpoint detected: /.well-known/nlweb.json returned HTTP 202 (text/html); GET /ask?query=hello returned HTTP 202 (text/html)

  fix → Consider exposing an NLWeb /ask endpoint (and /.well-known/nlweb.json) for conversational access to your content.

  Probed /.well-known/nlweb.json and the /ask endpoint

  spec ↗report issue
• ✗Semantic HTML structurerequired0/3

  Only 1/6 semantic signals present on the homepage (missing: <main> landmark, <nav> landmark, <header>/<footer>, exactly one <h1> (found 0), text-to-markup ratio ≥ 0.10)

  fix → Add landmark elements and a clean heading hierarchy — missing: <main> landmark, <nav> landmark, <header>/<footer>, exactly one <h1> (found 0), text-to-markup ratio ≥ 0.10.

  Scored landmark elements, heading hierarchy, and text-to-markup ratio on the homepage

  report issue
• ✗Content readable without JavaScriptrequired0/2

  Homepage raw HTML contains only 0 chars of visible text — an empty JS shell to non-rendering clients

  fix → Your homepage is an empty JS shell to non-rendering clients (0 chars of text). Server-render or prerender key pages — most agent fetchers don't execute JavaScript.

  Measured visible text in the raw, unrendered homepage HTML

  report issue
• ◐Accessibility basicsrequired1/2

  Homepage accessibility: 3/5 checks passed — failing: <title>; ≥2 landmarks (found 0: none)

  fix → Failing: <title>; ≥2 landmarks (found 0: none). The accessibility tree is what browser-operating agents see.

  Static checks: lang attribute, title, alt coverage, labeled inputs, landmarks

  report issue
• ✗WebMCPemerging0/1

  No WebMCP evidence on homepage: no application/webmcp script and no navigator.modelContext reference

  fix → Consider WebMCP to expose page actions as tools to browser agents.

  Looked for WebMCP script declarations on the homepage

  spec ↗report issue