grafana.com

Whether agents can crawl you, find you in the registries and searches they check, and trust what they find.

• ✓Sitemap present & freshrequired4/4

  Sitemap at https://grafana.com/sitemap.xml: 7909 entries, freshest <lastmod> 2026-08-17 (0 days ago)

  Resolved the sitemap from robots.txt or /sitemap.xml, validated XML, and checked lastmod freshness

  spec ↗report issue
• ✓Brand search discoverabilityrequired4/4

  Both searches ("Grafana Labs" and "Grafana Labs infrastructure devops") cited grafana.com: https://grafana.com/docs/grafana/latest/visualizations/dashboards/create-reports/, https://grafana.com/docs/grafana-cloud/visualizations/dashboards/create-reports/, https://grafana.com/security/security-advisories/, https://grafana.com/blog/grafana-reporting-how-we-improved-the-ux-in-grafana/, https://grafana.com/docs/learning-paths/configure-grafana-terraform/

  Ran clean brand-name web searches and checked whether your domain is cited in the results

  report issue
• —MCP registry listingsrecommendedna

  No MCP server detected for this product

  Queried the official MCP registry, Smithery, Glama, and PulseMCP for servers matching your domain

  spec ↗report issue

Whether your robots policy, bot protection, and agent guidance actively admit AI agents instead of blocking them.

• ✓robots.txt present & parseablerequired2/2

  /robots.txt parses: 1 User-agent group(s), 1 Sitemap line(s)

  Fetched /robots.txt and validated it parses as a robots policy

  spec ↗report issue
• ✓AI crawler policyrequired5/5

  All 12 AI crawler user-agents (GPTBot, ClaudeBot, PerplexityBot, …) are allowed at / by robots.txt

  Evaluated robots.txt groups for the major AI agent user-agents (GPTBot, ClaudeBot, PerplexityBot, …)

  report issue
• ✗Content Signals directivesemerging0/2

  No Content-Signal lines in robots.txt

  fix → Declare Content Signals in robots.txt (e.g. `Content-Signal: search=yes, ai-train=no`) to express AI usage preferences machine-readably.

  Looked for Content-Signal lines in robots.txt

  spec ↗report issue
• ✓Agent user-agent paritybetarequired4/4

  All three UAs get HTTP 200; bot bodies are ClaudeBot 100%, GPTBot 100% of the browser response (648861 bytes)

  Compared responses served to browser and AI-agent user-agents (informational while in beta)

  report issue
• ✗agents.mdrecommended0/3

  No agents.md: https://grafana.com/agents.md → HTTP 404, https://grafana.com/AGENTS.md → HTTP 404

  fix → Add /agents.md: what agents may do on your site, key URLs, auth, rate limits, and who to contact.

  Fetched /agents.md and checked for substantive agent guidance

  spec ↗report issue

Whether your pages carry machine-readable identity: structured data, llms.txt, clear copy an agent can quote.

• ✓Homepage states what you arerequired3/3

  Homepage clarity rated 5/5 — an agent can confidently say what this company does (model's one-sentence read: "Grafana Labs provides a full-stack observability platform, Grafana Cloud, that helps users monitor, analyze, and manage their systems and applications, including AI-powered operations, cost optimization, and breaking down data silos.")

  An LLM read your homepage as an agent would and rated how confidently it could say what you do

  report issue
• ✓OpenGraph / social metadatarecommended2/2

  Homepage has og:title, og:description, and og:image (twitter:card="summary_large_image" present)

  Parsed homepage og:title / og:description / og:image and twitter:card meta tags

  spec ↗report issue
• ✓llms.txtrecommended4/4

  /llms.txt is valid llmstxt.org shape: H1 "Grafana documentation", 92 markdown link(s)

  Fetched /llms.txt and validated it against the llmstxt.org shape (H1, summary, curated links)

  spec ↗report issue
• ✓llms-full.txtbonusrecommended2/2

  /llms-full.txt serves 1048554 chars of markdown

  Fetched /llms-full.txt and checked for substantial inline markdown content

  spec ↗report issue
• ✓JSON-LD structured datarequired4/4

  1 JSON-LD block(s) on homepage and pricing page (types: Organization); Organization block is well-formed

  Extracted and validated application/ld+json blocks on the homepage and pricing page

  spec ↗report issue
• ✓Markdown content negotiationrecommended3/3

  https://grafana.com/docs/ returns markdown for `Accept: text/markdown` (content-type text/markdown)

  Requested key pages with Accept: text/markdown and probed .md twin URLs

  report issue

Whether the artifacts an agent needs to build on you — docs, API specs, SDKs, MCP servers — exist and are findable.

• ✓Developer resource discoverabilityrecommended3/3

  Search "Grafana Labs API documentation" cited your own domain: https://grafana.com/docs/grafana/latest/developer-resources/api-reference/http-api/api-legacy/folder_dashboard_search/, https://grafana.com/docs/grafana-cloud/developer-resources/api-reference/http-api/apis/, https://grafana.com/docs/grafana/latest/developer-resources/api-reference/http-api/dashboard/, https://grafana.com/docs/grafana-cloud/developer-resources/api-reference/http-api/examples/, https://grafana.com/docs/grafana-cloud/developer-resources/api-reference/http-api/examples/curl-examples/

  Searched for your brand with developer-keyword suffixes and checked which official resources are cited

  report issue
• ✓OpenAPI spec discoverablerequired5/5

  OpenAPI spec found at https://grafana.com/api/openapi.json (version 3.0.3)

  Probed standard OpenAPI locations and docs links for a fetchable, parseable spec

  spec ↗report issue
• ✓Docs discoverablerequired4/4

  Docs found at https://grafana.com/docs/ (via homepage link, 6296 chars of readable text)

  Followed homepage nav/footer links and probed /docs, /developers, docs.{domain}

  report issue
• ✗MCP server discoveryrequired0/5

  No MCP evidence found: probed /.well-known/mcp/server-card.json, /.well-known/mcp.json, /mcp.json and scanned llms.txt, agents.md, and docs for endpoints or install commands

  fix → Publish /.well-known/mcp/server-card.json describing your MCP endpoint so agents can autodiscover it. Evidence found: none.

  Probed /.well-known/mcp/server-card.json, mcp.json, and docs mentions for an MCP endpoint

  spec ↗report issue
• ✗npm SDKrecommended0/2

  No official npm SDK found: probed 6 candidate(s) (@grafanalabs/sdk, @grafanalabs/grafanalabs, grafanalabs, grafanalabs-sdk, grafanalabs-api, grafanalabs-js)

  fix → Publish an official npm SDK (suggest @grafanalabs/sdk) with your domain in package.json homepage so agents can verify it's official.

  Searched the npm registry for an official, domain-verified SDK package

  report issue
• ✗PyPI SDKrecommended0/2

  No official PyPI SDK found: probed 4 candidate(s) (grafanalabs, grafanalabs-sdk, grafanalabsapi, grafanalabs-python)

  fix → Publish an official Python SDK (suggest "grafanalabs") with your domain in the project URLs so agents can verify it's official.

  Searched PyPI for an official, domain-verified SDK package

  report issue

Whether your specs, docs, and tools are complete and descriptive enough for an agent to use them without guessing.

• ✓OpenAPI validity & qualityrecommended3/3

  Spec at https://grafana.com/api/openapi.json: 6/7 quality criteria passed (34 paths, 55 operations) — failing: ≥ 70% of operations have description/summary

  Linted the spec: descriptions, operationIds, securitySchemes, servers

  report issue
• ◐Docs qualityrecommended1.8/3

  Docs at https://grafana.com/docs/ scored clarity 4/5, completeness 3/5, runnable examples 1/5, agent-friendliness 4/5 (mean 3.0/5)

  fix → Docs scored 1/5 on runnable examples. The documentation provides high-level overviews and links to various topics but lacks concrete, step-by-step instructions or API specifications for an agent to directly integrate with Grafana's functionalities.

  An LLM rated your docs for clarity, completeness, runnable examples, and agent-friendliness

  report issue
• ✗Quickstart / getting startedrecommended0/2

  No quickstart/getting-started link or heading found on docs page https://grafana.com/docs/ (searched 161 links)

  fix → Add a copy-pasteable quickstart (auth → first API call) — agents follow it literally.

  Looked for a quickstart/getting-started guide containing code blocks

  report issue
• —MCP tool qualityrecommendedna

  No MCP endpoint known — tool lint requires a tools/list

  Linted listed tools for descriptions, typed input schemas, and naming

  report issue

Response hygiene, TLS and redirect discipline, and security contact channels agents depend on at runtime.

• ✓TLS & redirect hygienerequired2/2

  http://grafana.com/ upgrades to https in 1 hop(s), 1 redirect(s) total, final HTTP 200; HSTS present

  Checked http→https redirect behavior, chain length, and TLS health

  report issue
• ✓Response speed & weightrequired1/1

  Homepage TTFB 52ms, payload 634KB, Content-Encoding: gzip

  Measured homepage TTFB, payload size, and compression

  report issue
• ✓security.txtrecommended1/1

  Valid security.txt at https://grafana.com/.well-known/security.txt: Contact mailto:security@grafana.com, Expires 2029-12-31

  Fetched /.well-known/security.txt and validated Contact + Expires

  spec ↗report issue

Whether agents can discover your auth model machine-readably (OAuth metadata) and follow documented steps to credentials.

• ✗OAuth authorization server metadatarecommended0/3

  Neither /.well-known/oauth-authorization-server nor /.well-known/openid-configuration resolved (HTTP 404 / HTTP 404)

  fix → Serve RFC 8414 metadata at /.well-known/oauth-authorization-server with PKCE (S256) and a registration_endpoint so agents can self-onboard.

  Fetched /.well-known/oauth-authorization-server (and openid-configuration fallback)

  spec ↗report issue
• ✗OAuth protected resource metadatarecommended0/2

  No RFC 9728 metadata: https://grafana.com/.well-known/oauth-protected-resource → HTTP 404

  fix → Serve RFC 9728 metadata at /.well-known/oauth-protected-resource naming your authorization servers so agents can discover how to authenticate.

  Fetched /.well-known/oauth-protected-resource

  spec ↗report issue
• ◐Auth documentationrecommended1/2

  Auth page https://grafana.com/auth/sign-in/ exists but contains no code examples

  fix → Add a runnable example (key creation → header format → example call) to your auth docs — agents follow it literally.

  Looked for /auth.md or an authentication docs page with code examples

  report issue

Whether pricing is discoverable and machine-readable, and whether you support agent payment protocols.

• ✓Pricing discoverablerequired5/5

  Pricing page found at https://grafana.com/pricing/ (via homepage link) with legible price signals ("$0 Perfect for personal projec").

  Followed nav/footer links and probed /pricing for a page with legible price signals

  report issue
• ✓Machine-readable pricingrecommended5/5

  LLM extracted 15 numerically-priced plan(s) from https://grafana.com/pricing/ at confidence 0.90: Free USD 0/always; Pro USD 19/month; Enterprise USD 25000/year; Metrics Free USD 0/always; Metrics Pro USD 6.5/1k series; Metrics Enterprise USD 3/1k series; Logs Free USD 0/always; Logs Pro Process USD 0.05/GB; Logs Pro Write USD 0.4/GB; Logs Pro Retain USD 0.1/GB; Logs Enterprise (contact sales); Traces Free USD 0/always; Traces Pro Process USD 0.05/GB; Traces Pro Write USD 0.4/GB; Traces Pro Retain USD 0.1/GB; Traces Enterprise (contact sales); Profiles Free USD 0/always.

  Looked for Offer JSON-LD, then had an LLM attempt structured extraction of your plans

  spec ↗report issue
• ✗x402 payment supportbonusrecommended0/2

  /.well-known/x402 returned HTTP 404. No x402 support detected (bonus check — absence costs nothing).

  fix → Support x402: serve payment requirements at /.well-known/x402, or answer unauthenticated API calls with HTTP 402 plus an x402 payment-requirements payload (x402Version, accepts[]).

  Probed /.well-known/x402 and API endpoints for HTTP 402 payment-required envelopes

  spec ↗report issue
• ✗AP2 readinessemerging0/1

  No AP2 hints found — scanned llms.txt, docs page (https://grafana.com/docs/), OpenAPI spec (https://grafana.com/api/openapi.json); /.well-known/ap2 returned HTTP 404.

  fix → Adopt AP2 to accept delegated agent payments — see https://ap2-protocol.org.

  Scanned fetched artifacts and well-known paths for AP2 hints

  spec ↗report issue
• ✗Agentic Commerce Protocolemerging0/1

  No Agentic Commerce Protocol hints found — scanned llms.txt, docs page (https://grafana.com/docs/), OpenAPI spec (https://grafana.com/api/openapi.json); /.well-known/acp returned HTTP 404.

  fix → Adopt the Agentic Commerce Protocol so agent checkouts can complete against your store — see https://developers.openai.com/commerce.

  Scanned docs and specs for agentic checkout endpoints

  spec ↗report issue
• ✗Other agent payment protocolsbonusemerging0/1

  No UCP/MPP hints found — scanned llms.txt, docs page (https://grafana.com/docs/), OpenAPI spec (https://grafana.com/api/openapi.json).

  fix → Track emerging agent payment protocols (UCP, MPP) and adopt the ones your buyers' agents use.

  Scanned fetched artifacts for UCP/MPP protocol hints

  report issue

Whether an end user's agent can operate on their behalf: working MCP tools, published skills, agent configs.

• —Agent skill publishedbonusemergingna

  Requires the analysis phase — not yet evaluated

  Checked /skill.md, /.well-known/skills/, and skills.sh for published agent skills

  report issue
• —MCP handshake & tools listrequiredna

  No MCP endpoint known — nothing to handshake with

  Performed a streamable-HTTP initialize + tools/list against the MCP endpoint

  spec ↗report issue
• —Agent configs in public repobonusemergingna

  Requires the analysis phase — not yet evaluated

  Checked your public GitHub org's main repos for AGENTS.md / .claude / .cursor configs

  report issue

Whether the site itself is legible to non-rendering and browser agents: semantic HTML, no JS walls, accessibility.

• ✗NLWeb endpointemerging0/1

  No NLWeb endpoint detected: /.well-known/nlweb.json returned HTTP 404 (text/html); GET /ask?query=hello returned HTTP 404 (text/html)

  fix → Consider exposing an NLWeb /ask endpoint (and /.well-known/nlweb.json) for conversational access to your content.

  Probed /.well-known/nlweb.json and the /ask endpoint

  spec ↗report issue
• ✓Semantic HTML structurerequired3/3

  5/6 semantic signals present on the homepage (missing: text-to-markup ratio ≥ 0.10)

  Scored landmark elements, heading hierarchy, and text-to-markup ratio on the homepage

  report issue
• ✓Content readable without JavaScriptrequired2/2

  Homepage raw HTML contains 6339 chars of visible text without JavaScript

  Measured visible text in the raw, unrendered homepage HTML

  report issue
• ✓Accessibility basicsrequired2/2

  Homepage accessibility: 4/5 checks passed — failing: labeled inputs (3/5 unlabeled)

  Static checks: lang attribute, title, alt coverage, labeled inputs, landmarks

  report issue
• ✗WebMCPemerging0/1

  No WebMCP evidence on homepage: no application/webmcp script and no navigator.modelContext reference

  fix → Consider WebMCP to expose page actions as tools to browser agents.

  Looked for WebMCP script declarations on the homepage

  spec ↗report issue